Political Law 1
CONSTITUTION: DEFINITION, NATURE AND CONCEPTS
Constitution
The Constitution is the fundamental and paramount law of the nation to which all other laws must conform and in accordance with which all private rights determined and all public authority administered. Laws that do not conform to the Constitution should be stricken down for being unconstitutional.
-
RESIDENT MARINE MAMMALS OF PROTECTED SEASCAPE TANON STRAIT v. SECRETARY ANGELO REYES, GR No. 180771, 2015-04-21
In Oposa, we allowed the suit to be brought in the name of generations yet... unborn "based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility insofar as the right to a balanced and healthful ecology is concerned."[56] Furthermore, we said that the right to a balanced and healthful ecology, a right that does not even need to be... stated in our Constitution as it is assumed to exist from the inception of humankind, carries with it the correlative duty to refrain from impairing the environment.[
Political law
... our Constitution requires that the President himself be the signatory of service agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving the exploration, development, and utilization of our minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils. This... power cannot be taken lightly.
-
LOUIS 'BAROK' C. BIRAOGO v. PHILIPPINE TRUTH COMMISSION OF 2010, GR No. 192935, 2010-12-07
-
Read the separate dissenting opinion of Leonardo-De Castro: MARY GRACE NATIVIDAD S. POE-LLAMANZARES v. COMELEC, GR No. 221697, 2016-03-08
it "should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws of the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal system of the Philippines." This Court also said that "while the future may ultimately uncover a doctrine's error, it should be, as a general rule, recognized as good law prior to its abandonment. Consequently, the people's reliance thereupon should be respected. -
MANILA PRINCE HOTEL v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, GR No. 122156, 1997-02-03
Hence, unless it is expressly provided that a legislative act is necessary to enforce a constitutional mandate, the presumption now is that all provisions of the constitution are... self-executing. If the constitutional provisions are treated as requiring legislation instead of self-executing, the legislature would have the power to ignore and practically nullify the mandate of the fundamental law.[14] This can be cataclysmic. That is... why the prevailing view is, as it has always been, that -... x x x x in case of doubt, the Constitution should be considered self-executing rather than non-self-executing x x x x Unless the contrary is clearly intended, the provisions of the Constitution should be considered self-executing, as a contrary rule would give the... legislature discretion to determine when, or whether, they shall be effective. These provisions would be subordinated to the will of the lawmaking body, which could make them entirely meaningless by simply refusing to pass the needed implementing statute.
A constitutional provision may be self-executing in one part and non-self-executing in another.
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Abad: WILSON P. GAMBOA v. FINANCE SECRETARY MARGARITO B. TEVES, GR No. 176579, 2011-06-28
-
CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES v. CA, GR Nos. 217126-27, 2015-11-10
this Court's abandonment of the condonation doctrine should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws or the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal... system of the Philippines.
Unto this Court devolves the sole authority to interpret what the Constitution means, and all persons are bound to follow its interpretation.
Judicial decisions assume the same authority as a statute itself and, until authoritatively abandoned, necessarily become, to the extent that they are applicable, the criteria that must control the actuations, not only of those called upon to abide by them, but also... of those duty-bound to enforce obedience to them.
[W]hen a doctrine of this Court is overruled and a different view is adopted, the new doctrine should be applied prospectively, and should not apply to parties who had relied on the old doctrine and acted on the faith thereof.
But while our decisions form part of the law of the land, they are also subject to Article 4... of the Civil Code which provides that "laws shall have no retroactive effect unless the contrary is provided." This is expressed in the familiar legal maxim lex prospicit, non respicit, the law looks forward not backward. The rationale against retroactivity is easy to... perceive. The retroactive application of a law usually divests rights that have already become vested or impairs the obligations of contract and hence, is unconstitutional.
-
FRANCISCO I. CHAVEZ v. JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL, GR No. 202242, 2012-07-17
It is a well-settled... principle of constitutional construction that the language employed in the Constitution must be given their ordinary meaning except where technical terms are employed. As much as possible, the words of the Constitution should be understood in the sense they have in common use.
What it says according to the text of the provision to be construed compels acceptance and negates the power of the courts to alter it, based on the postulate that the framers and the people mean what they say.[33] Verba legis non est recedendum from... the words of a statute there should be no departure.
-
DATU MICHAEL ABAS KIDA v. SENATE OF PHILIPPINES, GR No. 196271, 2011-10-18
-
HACIENDA LUISITA v. PRESIDENTIAL AGRARIAN REFORM COUNCIL, GR No. 171101, 2011-07-05
Constitutional Law
Political Law
-
BERNARDITA R. MACARIOLA v. ELIAS B. ASUNCION, Adm. Case No. 133-J, 1982-05-31
Political Law has been defined as that branch of public law which deals with the organization and operation of the governmental/organs of the State and define the relations of the state with the inhabitants of its territory... political law embraces constitutional law, law of public corporations, administrative law including the law on public officers and elections.
Article 14 of the Code of Commerce partakes more of the nature of an... administrative law because it regulates the conduct of certain public officers and employees with respect to engaging in business; hence, political in essence.
those laws which are political in their nature and pertain to the prerogatives of the former government immediately cease upon the transfer of... sovereignty.
While municipal laws of the newly acquired territory not in conflict with the laws of the new sovereign continue in force without the express assent or affirmative act of the conqueror, the political laws do not.
However,... such political laws of the prior sovereignty as are not in conflict with the constitution or institutions of the new sovereign, may be continued in force if the conqueror shall so declare by affirmative act of the commander-in-chief during the war, or by Congress in time of... peace.
Construction/Interpretation of the Constitution
-
ERNESTO B. FRANCISCO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, GR No. 160261, 2003-11-10
-
Read the separate dissenting opinion of Justice Leonardo-De Castro: MARY GRACE NATIVIDAD S. POE-LLAMANZARES v. COMELEC, GR No. 221697, 2016-03-08
it "should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws of the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal system of the Philippines." This Court also said that "while the future may ultimately uncover a doctrine's error, it should be, as a general rule, recognized as good law prior to its abandonment. Consequently, the people's reliance thereupon should be respected. -
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Abad: FRANCISCO I. CHAVEZ v. JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL, GR No. 202242, 2012-07-17
It is a well-settled... principle of constitutional construction that the language employed in the Constitution must be given their ordinary meaning except where technical terms are employed. As much as possible, the words of the Constitution should be understood in the sense they have in common use.
What it says according to the text of the provision to be construed compels acceptance and negates the power of the courts to alter it, based on the postulate that the framers and the people mean what they say.[33] Verba legis non est recedendum from... the words of a statute there should be no departure.
-
ATTY. ROMULO B. MACALINTAL v. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No. 191618, 2010-11-23
-
IMELDA ROMUALDEZ-MARCOS v. COMELEC, GR No. 119976, 1995-09-18
AMENDMENTS AND REVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION (ARTICLE XVII)
SELF-EXECUTING AND NON-SELF-EXECUTING PROVISIONS
-
MANILA PRINCE HOTEL v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, GR No. 122156, 1997-02-03
Hence, unless it is expressly provided that a legislative act is necessary to enforce a constitutional mandate, the presumption now is that all provisions of the constitution are... self-executing. If the constitutional provisions are treated as requiring legislation instead of self-executing, the legislature would have the power to ignore and practically nullify the mandate of the fundamental law.[14] This can be cataclysmic. That is... why the prevailing view is, as it has always been, that -... x x x x in case of doubt, the Constitution should be considered self-executing rather than non-self-executing x x x x Unless the contrary is clearly intended, the provisions of the Constitution should be considered self-executing, as a contrary rule would give the... legislature discretion to determine when, or whether, they shall be effective. These provisions would be subordinated to the will of the lawmaking body, which could make them entirely meaningless by simply refusing to pass the needed implementing statute.
A constitutional provision may be self-executing in one part and non-self-executing in another.
-
SATURNINO C. OCAMPO v. REAR ADMIRAL ERNESTO C. ENRIQUEZ, GR No. 225973, 2016-11-08
-
WILSON P. GAMBOA v. FINANCE SECRETARY MARGARITO B. TEVES, GR No. 176579, 2011-06-28
-
REV. ELLY CHAVEZ PAMATONG v. COMELEC, GR No. 161872, 2004-04-13
-
NEPTALI S. FRANCO v. ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, GR No. 194402, 2016-04-05
-
JAMES M. IMBONG v. PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 204819, 2014-04-08
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
-
ANTONIO M. SERRANO v. GALLANT MARITIME SERVICES, GR No. 167614, 2009-03-24
-
TONDO MEDICAL CENTER EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. CA, GR NO. 167324, 2007-07-17
GENERAL PROVISIONS (ARTICLE XVI)
The Armed Forces of the Philippines shall be composed of a citizen armed force...
The armed forces shall be insulated from partisan politics. No member of the military shall engage directly or indirectly in any partisan political activity, except to vote.
The State shall provide immediate and adequate care, benefits, and other forms of assistance to war veterans and veterans of military campaigns, their surviving spouses and orphans...
The State shall, from time to time, review to increase the pensions and other benefits due to retirees of both the government and the private sectors.
The State shall provide the policy environment for the full development of Filipino capability and the emergence of communication structures...
-
ROMULO L. NERI v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS, GR No. 180643, 2008-03-25
-
Read the separate concurring opinion of Justice Azcuna: FRANCISCO CHAVEZ v. RAUL M. GONZALES, GR No. 168338, 2008-02-15
The advertising industry is impressed with public interest, and shall be regulated by law for the protection of consumers and the promotion of the general welfare.
- Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Carpio: ELISEO F. SORIANO v. MA. CONSOLIZA P. LAGUARDIA, GR No. 164785, 2009-04-29
NATIONAL TERRITORY
The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines .
STATE IMMUNITY (Doctrine of Royal Prerogative of Dishonesty}
-
MOST REV. PEDRO D. ARIGO v. SCOTT H. SWIFT, GR No. 206510, 2014-09-16
-
REPUBLIC v. GUILLERMO P. VILLASOR, GR No. L-30671, 1973-11-28
-
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & COMMUNICATIONS v. SPOUSES ABECINA, GR No. 206484, 2016-06-29
-
HEIRS OF DIOSDADO M. MENDOZA v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, GR No. 203834, 2014-07-09
-
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA v. JAMES VINZON, GR No. 154705, 2003-06-26
-
SECRETARY OF HEALTH v. PHIL PHARMAWEALTH, GR No. 182358, 2013-02-20
-
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE v. NLRC, GR No. 104269, 1993-11-11
-
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. CELSO O ATE, GR No. 161758, 2007-06-08
-
CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY v. CESAR D. SANTAMARIA, GR No. 185572, 2012-02-07
-
PROFESSIONAL VIDEO v. TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GR No. 155504, 2009-06-26
-
DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT F R TECHNISCHE ZUSAMMENARBEIT v. CA, GR No. 152318, 2009-04-16
-
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH v. PHIL. PHARMAWEALTH, GR NO. 169304, 2007-03-13
II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES (ARTICLE II)
Article II is a statement of general ideological principles and policies. It is not a source of enforceable rights. BASES CONVERSION v. COA, GR No. 178160, 2009-02-26)
The Philippines is a democratic and republican State. Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Puno: JUAN G. FRIVALDO v. COMELEC, GR No. 120295, 1996-06-28
No. 1
... the citizenship requirement in the Local Government Code is to be possessed by an elective official at the latest as of the time he is proclaimed and at the start of the term of office to which he has been elected. -
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Puno: ARTURO M. TOLENTINO v. COMELEC, GR No. 148334, 2004-01-21
-
JOSE JESUS M. DISINI v. SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, GR No. 203335, 2014-02-18
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Puno: RAUL L. LAMBINO v. COMELEC, GR NO. 174153, 2006-10-25
-
PEOPLE v. JUDGE JOSE R. HERNANDEZ, GR NOS. 154218 & 154372, 2006-08-28
-
IRINEO MOYA v. AGRIPINO GA. DEL FIERRO, GR No. 46863, 1939-11-18
-
Read the separate opinion of Justice Vitug: ERNESTO B. FRANCISCO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, GR No. 160261, 2003-11-10
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Mendoza: JOSEPH E. ESTRADA v. ANIANO DESIERTO, GR Nos. 146710-15, 2001-03-02
The Philippines adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land. (Doctrine of incorporation}
-
PHARMACEUTICAL v. HEALTH SECRETARY FRANCISCO T. DUQUE III, GR NO. 173034, 2007-10-09
[G]enerally accepted principles of international law, by virtue of the incorporation clause of the Constitution, form part of the laws of the land even if they do not derive from treaty obligations. The classical formulation in international law sees those... customary rules accepted as binding result from the combination [of] two elements: the established, widespread, and consistent practice on the part of States; and a psychological element known as the opinion juris sive necessitates (opinion as to... law or necessity). Implicit in the latter element is a belief that the practice in question is rendered obligatory by the existence of a rule of law requiring it.
Generally accepted principles of international law" refers to norms of general or customary international law which are binding on all states,[17] i.e., renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy, the principle of sovereign... immunity,[18] a person's right to life, liberty and due process,[19] and pacta sunt servanda,[20] among others. The concept of "generally accepted principles of law" has also been depicted in this wise:
Some legal scholars and judges look upon certain "general principles of law" as a primary source of international law because they have the "character of jus rationale" and are "valid through all kinds of human societies." (Judge Tanaka in his dissenting... opinion in the 1966 South West Africa Case, 1966 I.C.J. 296). O'Connell holds that certain priniciples are part of international law because they are "basic to legal systems generally" and hence part of the jus gentium. These principles, he believes, are... established by a process of reasoning based on the common identity of all legal systems. If there should be doubt or disagreement, one must look to state practice and determine whether the municipal law principle provides a just and acceptable solution
-
WIGBERTO E. TA ADA v. EDGARDO ANGARA, GR No. 118295, 1997-05-02
-
GEN. AVELINO I. RAZON v. MARY JEAN B. TAGITIS, GR No. 182498, 2009-12-03
-
SHIGENORI KURODA v. MAJOR GENERAL RAFAEL JALANDONI, GR No. L-2662, 1949-03-26
-
MARY GRACE NATIVIDAD S. POE-LLAMANZARES v. COMELEC, GR No. 221697, 2016-03-08
it "should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws of the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal system of the Philippines." This Court also said that "while the future may ultimately uncover a doctrine's error, it should be, as a general rule, recognized as good law prior to its abandonment. Consequently, the people's reliance thereupon should be respected. -
GOVERNMENT OF HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. FELIXBERTO T. OLALIA, GR NO. 153675, 2007-04-19
This Court has admitted to bail persons who are not... involved in criminal proceedings. In fact, bail has been allowed in this jurisdiction to persons in detention during the pendency of administrative proceedings, taking into cognizance the obligation of the Philippines under international conventions to uphold human... rights.
But while extradition is not a criminal proceeding, it is characterized by the following: (a) it entails a deprivation of liberty on the part of the potential extraditee and (b) the means employed to attain the purpose of extradition is also "the machinery of criminal... law
To refuse him bail is to treat him as a person who has committed the most serious crime known to law;" and that while deportation is not a criminal proceeding, some of the machinery used "is the machinery of criminal law.
If bail can be granted in deportation cases, we see no justification why it should not also be allowed in extradition cases
If bail can be granted in deportation cases, we see no justification why it should not also be allowed in extradition cases. Likewise, considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to deportation cases, there is no reason why it cannot be invoked in... extradition cases. After all, both are administrative proceedings where the innocence or guilt of the person detained is not in issue.
Likewise, considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to deportation cases, there is no reason why it cannot be invoked in... extradition cases. After all, both are administrative proceedings where the innocence or guilt of the person detained is not in issue.
Clearly, the right of a prospective extraditee to apply for bail in this jurisdiction must be viewed in the light of the various treaty obligations of the Philippines concerning respect for the promotion and protection of human rights. Under these treaties, the presumption lies... in favor of human liberty. Thus, the Philippines should see to it that the right to liberty of every individual is not impaired.
The applicable standard of due process, however, should not be the same as that in criminal proceedings. In the latter, the standard of due process is premised on the presumption of innocence of the accused. As Purganan correctly points out, it is from this major... premise that the ancillary presumption in favor of admitting to bail arises. Bearing in mind the purpose of extradition proceedings, the premise behind the issuance of the arrest warrant and the "temporary detention" is the possibility of flight of the potential extraditee. This... is based on the assumption that such extraditee is a fugitive from justice
The applicable standard of due process, however, should not be the same as that in criminal proceedings. In the latter, the standard of due process is premised on the presumption of innocence of the accused. As Purganan correctly points out, it is from this major... premise that the ancillary presumption in favor of admitting to bail arises. Bearing in mind the purpose of extradition proceedings, the premise behind the issuance of the arrest warrant and the "temporary detention" is the possibility of flight of the potential extraditee. This... is based on the assumption that such extraditee is a fugitive from justice.
The time-honored principle of pacta sunt servanda... demands that the Philippines honor its obligations under the Extradition Treaty it entered into with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Failure to comply with these obligations is a setback in our foreign... relations and defeats the purpose of extradition.
An extradition proceeding being sui generis, the standard of proof required in granting or denying bail can neither be the proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases nor the standard of proof of preponderance of evidence in civil cases. While administrative in... character, the standard of substantial evidence used in administrative cases cannot likewise apply given the object of extradition law which is to prevent the prospective extraditee from fleeing our jurisdiction
The potential extraditee must prove by "clear and convincing evidence" that he is not a flight risk and will abide with all the orders and processes of the extradition court
-
MOST REV. PEDRO D. ARIGO v. SCOTT H. SWIFT, GR No. 206510, 2014-09-16
-
MARILOU S. LAUDE v. ROLINE M. GINEZ-JABALDE, GR No. 217456, 2015-11-24
-
BANK OF PHILIPPINE ISLANDS SECURITIES CORPORATION v. EDGARDO V. GUEVARA, GR No. 167052, 2015-03-11
-
BORIS MEJOFF v. THE DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, GR No. L-4254, 1951-09-26
-
DANTE V. LIBAN v. RICHARD J. GORDON, GR No. 175352, 2009-07-15
-
LOURDES D. RUBRICO v. GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, GR No. 183871, 2010-02-18
Civilian authority is, at all times, supreme over the military. (Civilian supremacy clause}
-
INTEGRATED BAR OF PHILIPPINES v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA, GR No. 141284, 2000-08-15
-
JAMAR M. KULAYAN v. GOV. ABDUSAKUR M. TAN, GR No. 187298, 2012-07-03
-
FIRST CLASS CADET ALDRIN JEFF P. CUDIA OF PHILIPPINE MILITARY ACADEMY v. SUPERINTENDENT OF PHILIPPINE MILITARY ACADEMY, GR No. 211362, 2015-02-24
academic freedom has never been meant to be an unabridged license. It is a privilege that assumes a correlative duty... to exercise it responsibly. An equally telling precept is a long recognized mandate, so well expressed in Article 19 of the Civil Code, that every 'person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and... observe honesty and good faith. -
VETERANS FEDERATION OF PHILIPPINES v. ANGELO T. REYES, GR NO. 155027, 2006-02-28
The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the people.
The Government may call upon the people to defend the State and, in the fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under conditions provided by law, to render personal military or civil service.
The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable.
-
JAMES M. IMBONG v. PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 204819, 2014-04-08
-
ANDRES GARCES v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, GR No. 53487, 1981-05-25
-
MUNICIPALITY OF TANGKAL v. RASAD B. BALINDONG, GR No. 193340, 2017-01-11
-
PASTOR DIONISIO V. AUSTRIA v. NLRC, GR No. 124382, 1999-08-16
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Barredo: FORTUNATO R. PAMIL v. VICTORINO C. TELERON, GR No. L-34854, 1978-11-20
The State shall promote a just and dynamic social order that will ensure the prosperity and independence of the nation and free the people from poverty through policies that provide adequate social services, promote full employment, a rising standard of living, and an improved quality of life for all.
The State shall promote social justice in all phases of national development.
The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights.
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Carpio: MVRS PUBLICATIONS v. ISLAMIC DA'WAH COUNCIL OF PHILIPPINES, GR No. 135306, 2003-01-28
-
GOVERNMENT OF HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. FELIXBERTO T. OLALIA, GR NO. 153675, 2007-04-19
This Court has admitted to bail persons who are not... involved in criminal proceedings. In fact, bail has been allowed in this jurisdiction to persons in detention during the pendency of administrative proceedings, taking into cognizance the obligation of the Philippines under international conventions to uphold human... rights.
But while extradition is not a criminal proceeding, it is characterized by the following: (a) it entails a deprivation of liberty on the part of the potential extraditee and (b) the means employed to attain the purpose of extradition is also "the machinery of criminal... law
To refuse him bail is to treat him as a person who has committed the most serious crime known to law;" and that while deportation is not a criminal proceeding, some of the machinery used "is the machinery of criminal law.
If bail can be granted in deportation cases, we see no justification why it should not also be allowed in extradition cases
If bail can be granted in deportation cases, we see no justification why it should not also be allowed in extradition cases. Likewise, considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to deportation cases, there is no reason why it cannot be invoked in... extradition cases. After all, both are administrative proceedings where the innocence or guilt of the person detained is not in issue.
Likewise, considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to deportation cases, there is no reason why it cannot be invoked in... extradition cases. After all, both are administrative proceedings where the innocence or guilt of the person detained is not in issue.
Clearly, the right of a prospective extraditee to apply for bail in this jurisdiction must be viewed in the light of the various treaty obligations of the Philippines concerning respect for the promotion and protection of human rights. Under these treaties, the presumption lies... in favor of human liberty. Thus, the Philippines should see to it that the right to liberty of every individual is not impaired.
The applicable standard of due process, however, should not be the same as that in criminal proceedings. In the latter, the standard of due process is premised on the presumption of innocence of the accused. As Purganan correctly points out, it is from this major... premise that the ancillary presumption in favor of admitting to bail arises. Bearing in mind the purpose of extradition proceedings, the premise behind the issuance of the arrest warrant and the "temporary detention" is the possibility of flight of the potential extraditee. This... is based on the assumption that such extraditee is a fugitive from justice
The applicable standard of due process, however, should not be the same as that in criminal proceedings. In the latter, the standard of due process is premised on the presumption of innocence of the accused. As Purganan correctly points out, it is from this major... premise that the ancillary presumption in favor of admitting to bail arises. Bearing in mind the purpose of extradition proceedings, the premise behind the issuance of the arrest warrant and the "temporary detention" is the possibility of flight of the potential extraditee. This... is based on the assumption that such extraditee is a fugitive from justice.
The time-honored principle of pacta sunt servanda... demands that the Philippines honor its obligations under the Extradition Treaty it entered into with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Failure to comply with these obligations is a setback in our foreign... relations and defeats the purpose of extradition.
An extradition proceeding being sui generis, the standard of proof required in granting or denying bail can neither be the proof beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases nor the standard of proof of preponderance of evidence in civil cases. While administrative in... character, the standard of substantial evidence used in administrative cases cannot likewise apply given the object of extradition law which is to prevent the prospective extraditee from fleeing our jurisdiction
The potential extraditee must prove by "clear and convincing evidence" that he is not a flight risk and will abide with all the orders and processes of the extradition court
-
PHILIPPINE ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY v. COA & MA. GRACIA M. PULIDO TAN, GR No. 210903, 2016-10-11
-
MARY GRACE NATIVIDAD S. POE-LLAMANZARES v. COMELEC, GR No. 221697, 2016-03-08
it "should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws of the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal system of the Philippines." This Court also said that "while the future may ultimately uncover a doctrine's error, it should be, as a general rule, recognized as good law prior to its abandonment. Consequently, the people's reliance thereupon should be respected. -
JUAN PONCE ENRILE v. SANDIGANBAYAN, GR No. 213847, 2015-08-18
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Leonen: NICOLAS S. MATUDAN v. REPUBLIC, GR No. 203284, 2016-11-14
abandonment by a spouse, by itself, however, does not warrant a finding of psychological incapacity within the contemplation of the Family Code. It must be shown that such abandonment is a manifestation of a disordered personality which makes the spouse concerned completely unable to discharge the essential obligations of the marital state.
definitive guidelines
(1) The burden of proof to show the nullity of the marriage belongs to the plaintiff. Any doubt should be.resolved in favor of the existence and continuation of the marriage and against its dissolution and nullity.(2) The root cause of the psychological incapacity must be: (a) medically or clinically identified, (b) alleged in the complaint, (c) sufficiently proven by experts and (d) clearly explained in the decision.(3) The incapacity must be proven to be existing at 'the time of the celebration' of the marriage,(4) Such incapacity must also be shown to be medically or clinically permanent or incurable.(5) Such illness must be grave enough to bring about the disability of the party to assume the essential obligations of marriage.(6) The essential marital obligations must be those embraced by Articles 68 up to 71 of the Family Code as regards the husband and wife as well as Articles 220, 221 and 225 of the same Code in regard to parents and their children.(7) Interpretations given by the National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal of the Catholic Church in the Philippines, while not controlling or decisive, should be given great respect by our courts.(8) The trial court must order the prosecuting attorney or fiscal and the Solicitor General to appear as counsel for the state. No decision shall be handed down unless the Solicitor General issues a certification, which will be quoted in the decision, briefly stating therein his reasons for his agreement or opposition, as the case may be, to the petition.
The Guidelines incorporate the basic requirements established in Santos v. Court of Appeals that psychological incapacity must be characterized by: (a) gravity; (b) juridical antecedence; and (c) incurability. These requisites must be strictly complied with, as the grant of a petition for nullity of marriage based on psychological incapacity must be confined only to the most serious cases of personality disorders clearly demonstrative of an utter insensitivity or inability to give meaning and significance to the marriage.
The State recognizes the sanctity of family life and shall protect and strengthen the family as a basic autonomous social institution.
-
JO-ANN DIAZ-SALGADO & HUSBAND DR. GERARD C. SALGADO v. LUIS G. ANSON, GR No. 204494, 2016-07-27
"[T]o be considered void on the ground of absence of a marriage license, the law requires that the absence of such marriage license must be apparent on the marriage contract, or at the very least, supported by a certification from the local civil registrar that no such marriage license was issued to the parties."[79]
Considering that the absence of the marriage license is apparent on the marriage contract itself, with a false statement therein that the marriage is of an exceptional character, and no proof to the contrary was presented, there is no other plausible conclusion other than that the marriage between Luis and Severina was celebrated without a valid marriage license and is thus, void ab initio.
a marriage solemnized without a marriage license based on a fabricated claim of exceptional character, is void. In lieu of a marriage license, therein parties to the marriage executed a false affidavit of marital cohabitation. In declaring the marriage void, the Court rejected the notion that all the formal and essential requisites of marriage were complied with. The Court held that to permit a false affidavit to take the place of a marriage license is to allow an abject circumvention of the law.
The Court cannot turn a blind eye to the statements made in the marriage contract because these refer to the absence of a formal requisite of marriage. "The parties should not be afforded any excuse to not comply with every single requirement and later use the same missing element as a pre-conceived escape ground to nullify their marriage. There should be no exemption from securing a marriage license unless the circumstances clearly fall within the ambit of the exception."[82]
"The requirement and issuance of marriage license is the State's demonstration of its involvement and participation in every marriage, in the maintenance of which the general public is interested. This interest proceeds from the constitutional mandate that the State recognizes the sanctity of family life and of affording protection to the family as a basic 'autonomous social institution
-
REPUBLIC v. MARIA FE ESPINOSA CANTOR, GR No. 184621, 2013-12-10
The Family Code was explicit that the court's judgment in summary proceedings, such as the declaration of presumptive death of an absent spouse under Article 41 of the Family Code, shall be immediately final and executory.
With the judgment being final, it necessarily follows that it is no longer subject to an appeal, the dispositions and conclusions therein having become immutable and unalterable not only as against the parties but even as against the courts.[8]
Modification... of the court's ruling, no matter how erroneous is no longer permissible. The final and executory nature of this summary proceeding thus prohibits the resort to appeal.
A losing party in this proceeding, however, is not entirely left without a remedy. While jurisprudence tells us that no appeal can be made from the trial court's judgment, an aggrieved party may, nevertheless, file a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of
Court to question any abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction that transpired.
The Essential Requisites for the Declaration of Presumptive Death Under Article 41 of the Family Code
Before a judicial declaration of presumptive death can be obtained, it must be shown that the prior spouse had been absent for four consecutive years and the present spouse had a well-founded belief that the prior spouse was already dead. Under Article 41 of the Family Code,... there are four (4) essential requisites for the declaration of presumptive death:
That the absent spouse has been missing for four consecutive years, or two consecutive years if the disappearance occurred where there is danger of death under the circumstances laid down in Article 391, Civil Code;
That the present spouse wishes to remarry;
That the present spouse has a well-founded belief that the absentee is dead; and
That the present spouse files a summary proceeding for the declaration of presumptive death of the absentee.[12]
The Present Spouse Has the Burden of Proof to Show that All the Requisites Under Article 41 of the Family Code Are Present
The burden of proof rests on the present spouse to show that all the requisites under Article 41 of the Family Code are present. Since it is the present spouse who, for purposes of declaration of presumptive death, substantially asserts the affirmative of the issue, it stands to... reason that the burden of proof lies with him/her. He who alleges a fact has the burden of proving it and mere allegation is not evidence.
Declaration of Presumptive Death Under Article 41 of the Family Code Imposes a Stricter Standard
Notably, Article 41 of the Family Code, compared to the old provision of the Civil Code which it superseded, imposes a stricter standard. It requires a "well-founded belief" that the absentee is already dead before a petition for declaration of presumptive... death can be granted. We have had occasion to make the same observation in Republic v. Nolasco,[14]... where we noted the crucial differences between Article 41 of the Family Code and Article 83 of the Civil Code, to wit:
Under Article 41, the time required for the presumption to arise has been shortened to four (4) years; however, there is need for a judicial declaration of presumptive death to enable the spouse present to remarry. Also, Article 41 of the Family Code imposes a... stricter standard than the Civil Code: Article 83 of the Civil Code merely requires either that there be no news that such absentee is still alive; or the absentee is generally considered to be dead and believed to be so by the spouse present, or is... presumed dead under Articles 390 and 391 of the Civil Code. The Family Code, upon the other hand, prescribes as "well founded belief" that the absentee is already dead before a petition for declaration of presumptive death can be... granted.
Thus, mere absence of the spouse (even for such period required by the law), lack of any news that such absentee is still alive, failure to communicate or general presumption of absence under the Civil Code would not suffice. This conclusion proceeds from the premise that
Article 41 of the Family Code places upon the present spouse the burden of proving the additional and more stringent requirement of "well-founded belief" which can only be discharged upon a showing of proper and honest-to-goodness inquiries and efforts to ascertain not... only the absent spouse's whereabouts but, more importantly, that the absent spouse is still alive or is already dead.
The Requirement of Well-Founded Belief
The law did not define what is meant by "well-founded belief." It depends upon the circumstances of each particular case. Its determination, so to speak, remains on a case-to-case basis. To be able to comply with this requirement, the present spouse must prove that his/her... belief was the result of diligent and reasonable efforts and inquiries to locate the absent spouse and that based on these efforts and inquiries, he/she believes that under the circumstances, the absent spouse is already dead. It requires exertion of active effort (not... a mere passive one).
To illustrate this degree of "diligent and reasonable search" required by the law, an analysis of the following relevant cases is warranted:
-
MARIETTA B. ANCHETA v. RODOLFO S. ANCHETA, GR No. 145370, 2004-03-04
-
MANUEL G. ALMELOR v. RTC OF LAS PI AS CITY, GR No. 179620, 2008-08-26
-
MARIA JEANETTE C. TECSON v. COMELEC, GR No. 161434, 2004-03-03
-
ENGRACE NI AL FOR HERSELF v. NORMA BAYADOG, GR No. 133778, 2000-03-14
the five-year common-law cohabitation period, which is counted back from the date of celebration of marriage, should be a period of legal union had it not been for the absence of the marriage. This 5-year period should... be the years immediately before the day of the marriage and it should be a period of cohabitation characterized by exclusivity - meaning no third party was involved at any time within the 5 years and continuity - that is unbroken. Otherwise, if that continuous 5-year... cohabitation is computed without any distinction as to whether the parties were capacitated to marry each other during the entire five years, then the law would be sanctioning immorality and encouraging parties to have common law relationships and placing them on the same... footing with those who lived faithfully with their spouse. Marriage being a special relationship must be respected as such and its requirements must be strictly observed. The presumption that a man and a woman deporting themselves as husband and wife is based on the... approximation of the requirements of the law. The parties should not be afforded any excuse to not comply with every single requirement and later use the same missing element as a pre-conceived escape ground to nullify their marriage. There should be no exemption from securing a... marriage license unless the circumstances clearly fall within the ambit of the exception. It should be noted that a license is required in order to notify the public that two persons are about to be united in matrimony and that anyone who is aware or has knowledge of any... impediment to the union of the two shall make it known to the local civil registrar.
However, other than for purposes of remarriage, no judicial action is necessary to declare a marriage an absolute nullity. For other purposes, such as but not limited to determination of heirship, legitimacy or illegitimacy of a child, settlement of estate, dissolution of... property regime, or a criminal case for that matter, the court may pass upon the validity of marriage even in a suit not directly instituted to question the same so long as it is essential to the determination of the case. This is without prejudice to any issue that may arise in... the case. When such need arises, a final judgment of declaration of nullity is necessary even if the purpose is other than to remarry. The clause "on the basis of a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void" in Article 40 of the Family Code connotes that such final... judgment need not be obtained only for purpose of remarriage.
It shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception.
-
CONTINENTAL STEEL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. ACCREDITED VOLUNTARY ARBITRATOR ALLAN S. MONTA O, GR No. 182836, 2009-10-13
while the Civil Code expressly provides that civil personality may be extinguished by death, it does not explicitly state that only those who have acquired... juridical personality could die.
death has been defined as the cessation of life.[24]
Life is not synonymous with civil personality. One need not acquire civil personality first before he/she could die. Even a child inside the womb already has life. No less than... the Constitution recognizes the life of the unborn from conception,[25]... that the State must protect equally with the life of the mother. If the unborn already has life, then the cessation thereof even prior to the child being delivered, qualifies as... death.
The natural and primary right and duty of parents in the rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the development of moral character shall receive the support of the Government.
The State recognizes the vital role of the youth in national building and shall promote and protect their physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual, and social well-being. It shall inculcate in the youth patriotism and nationalism, and encourage their involvement in public and civic affairs.
-
ROEL EBRALINAG v. DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OF CEBU, GR No. 95770, 1995-12-29
-
Read the opinion of Chief Justice Sereno: MARY GRACE NATIVIDAD S. POE-LLAMANZARES v. COMELEC, GR No. 221697, 2016-03-08
it "should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws of the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal system of the Philippines." This Court also said that "while the future may ultimately uncover a doctrine's error, it should be, as a general rule, recognized as good law prior to its abandonment. Consequently, the people's reliance thereupon should be respected. -
Read the separate concurring opinion of Justice Brion: JAMES M. IMBONG v. PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 204819, 2014-04-08
The State recognizes the role of women in nation-building, and shall ensure the fundamental equality before the law of women and men.
-
SARAH B. VEDA A v. JUDGE EUDARLIO B. VALENCIA, AM No. RTJ-96-1351, 1998-09-03
-
Read the separate opinion of Justice Romero: IMELDA ROMUALDEZ-MARCOS v. COMELEC, GR No. 119976, 1995-09-18
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Romero: HATIMA C. YASIN v. JUDGE SHARI A DISTRICT COURT THIRD SHARI A JUDICIAL DISTRICT, GR No. 94986, 1995-02-23
The State shall protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.
-
JAMES M. IMBONG v. PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 204819, 2014-04-08 - Read also the concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice Reyes
The State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature.
-
REPUBLIC v. PAGADIAN CITY TIMBER CO., GR No. 159308, 2008-09-16
-
AUGUSTUS L. MOMONGAN v. JUDGE RAFAEL B. OMIPON, AM No. MTJ-93-874, 1995-03-14
-
HILARION M. HENARES v. LAND TRANSPORTATION FRANCHISING, GR NO. 158290, 2006-10-23
-
WILFREDO MOSQUEDA v. PILIPINO BANANA GROWERS & EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION, GR No. 189185, 2016-08-16
Political Law
... taking only becomes confiscatory if it substantially divests the owner of the beneficial use of its property -
RESIDENT MARINE MAMMALS OF PROTECTED SEASCAPE TANON STRAIT v. SECRETARY ANGELO REYES, GR No. 180771, 2015-04-21
In Oposa, we allowed the suit to be brought in the name of generations yet... unborn "based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility insofar as the right to a balanced and healthful ecology is concerned."[56] Furthermore, we said that the right to a balanced and healthful ecology, a right that does not even need to be... stated in our Constitution as it is assumed to exist from the inception of humankind, carries with it the correlative duty to refrain from impairing the environment.[
Political law
... our Constitution requires that the President himself be the signatory of service agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving the exploration, development, and utilization of our minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils. This... power cannot be taken lightly.
-
RAMON JESUS P. PAJE v. TEODORO A. CASI O, GR No. 207257, 2015-02-03
-
LNL ARCHIPELAGO MINERALS v. AGHAM PARTY LIST, GR No. 209165, 2016-04-12
-
ALFREDO TANO v. GOV. SALVADOR P. SOCRATES, GR No. 110249, 1997-08-21
-
PROVINCE OF RIZAL v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, GR NO. 129546, 2005-12-13
-
REPUBLIC v. NORMELITO J. BALLOCANAG, GR No. 163794, 2008-11-28
The State shall give priority to education, science and technology, arts, culture, and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism, accelerate social progress, and promote total human liberation and development.
- Read the concurring opinion of Justice Leonen: FILM DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF PHILIPPINES v. COLON HERITAGE REALTY CORPORATION, GR No. 203754, 2015-06-16
The State affirms labor as a primary social economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare.
-
ANTONIO M. SERRANO v. GALLANT MARITIME SERVICES, GR No. 167614, 2009-03-24
-
GREGORIO V. TONGKO v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE CO., GR No. 167622, 2011-01-25
-
THE PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL v. UNOCAL PHILIPPINES, GR No. 190187, 2016-09-28
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Brion: BANK OF PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. BPI EMPLOYEES UNION-DAVAO CHAPTER-FEDERATION OF UNIONS IN BPI UNIBANK, GR No. 164301, 2010-08-10
-
PROFESSIONAL VIDEO v. TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GR No. 155504, 2009-06-26
-
JAIME M. BARRIOS v. EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, GR NO. 148089, 2006-03-24
-
ANFLO MANAGEMENT v. RODOLFO D. BOLANIO, GR No. 141608, 2002-10-04
-
PLANTERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN NEGROS INC. v. BERNARDO T. PONFERRADA, GR No. 114087, 1999-10-26
-
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. NLRCS, GR No. 100353, 1999-10-22
-
GREGORIO ARANETA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION v. NLRC, GRNos. 75925-26, 1987-10-29
The State shall develop a self-reliant and independent national economy effectively controlled by Filipinos.
-
HEIRS OF WILSON P. GAMBOA v. FINANCE SECRETARY MARGARITO B. TEVES, GR No. 176579, 2012-10-09
-
JOSE M. ROY III v. CHAIRPERSON TERESITA HERBOSA, GR No. 207246, 2016-11-22
-
REPRESENTATIVES GERARDO S. ESPINA v. RONALDO ZAMORA, GR No. 143855, 2010-09-21
-
WIGBERTO E. TA ADA v. EDGARDO ANGARA, GR No. 118295, 1997-05-02
The State recognizes the indispensable role of the private sector, encourages private enterprise, and provides incentives to needed investments.
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Corona: ASIA'S EMERGING DRAGON CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, GR No. 169914, 2008-04-18
-
TEODORICO ROSARIO v. VICTORY RICEMILL, GR No. 147572, 2003-02-19
The State recognizes the vital role of communication and information in nation-building.
-
PHILIPPINE TELEGRAPH TELEPHONE CORP. v. SMART COMMUNICATIONS, GR No. 189026, 2016-11-09
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Leonen: RAPPLER v. ANDRES D. BAUTISTA, GR No. 222702, 2016-04-05
The State shall ensure the autonomy of local governments.
-
AQUILINO Q. PIMENTEL JR. v. ALEXANDER AGUIRRE, GR No. 132988, 2000-07-19
-
MAYOR PABLO P. MAGTAJAS v. PRYCE PROPERTIES CORPORATION, GR No. 111097, 1994-07-20
-
RTC JUDGES MERCEDES G. DADOLE v. COA, GR No. 125350, 2002-12-03
-
REYNALDO R. SAN JUAN v. VS.CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, GR No. 92299, 1991-04-19
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law.
-
REV. ELLY CHAVEZ PAMATONG v. COMELEC, GR No. 161872, 2004-04-13
-
SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS v. COMELEC, GR No. 208062, 2015-04-07
The State shall maintain honesty and integrity in the public service and take positive and effective measures against graft and corruption.
-
CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES v. CA, GR Nos. 217126-27, 2015-11-10
this Court's abandonment of the condonation doctrine should be prospective in application for the reason that judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws or the Constitution, until reversed, shall form part of the legal... system of the Philippines.
Unto this Court devolves the sole authority to interpret what the Constitution means, and all persons are bound to follow its interpretation.
Judicial decisions assume the same authority as a statute itself and, until authoritatively abandoned, necessarily become, to the extent that they are applicable, the criteria that must control the actuations, not only of those called upon to abide by them, but also... of those duty-bound to enforce obedience to them.
[W]hen a doctrine of this Court is overruled and a different view is adopted, the new doctrine should be applied prospectively, and should not apply to parties who had relied on the old doctrine and acted on the faith thereof.
But while our decisions form part of the law of the land, they are also subject to Article 4... of the Civil Code which provides that "laws shall have no retroactive effect unless the contrary is provided." This is expressed in the familiar legal maxim lex prospicit, non respicit, the law looks forward not backward. The rationale against retroactivity is easy to... perceive. The retroactive application of a law usually divests rights that have already become vested or impairs the obligations of contract and hence, is unconstitutional.
-
JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA v. SANDIGANBAYAN, GR No. 148560, 2001-11-19
-
MA. VICTORIA C. HIDALGO v. MORENO L. MAGTIBAY, AM No. P-02-1661, 2004-10-07
-
OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN v. JOEL S. SAMANIEGO, GR No. 175573, 2008-09-11
-
JOSEPH E. ESTRADA v. ANIANO DESIERTO, GR Nos. 146710-15, 2001-03-02
-
PNP CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND v. MELENCIA LANDICHO-LINTAO, AC. No. SB-95-7-P, 1997-11-18
-
NARITA RABE v. DELSA M. FLORES, AM No. P-97-1247, 1997-05-14
The State adopts and implements a policy of full public disclosure of all its transactions involving public interest.
-
INITIATIVES FOR DIALOGUE v. POWER SECTOR ASSETS, GR No. 192088, 2012-10-09
-
RICARDO VALMONTE v. FELICIANO BELMONTE, GR No. 74930, 1989-02-13
-
VALENTIN L. LEGASPI v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, GR No. 72119, 1987-05-29
-
FRANCISCO I. CHAVEZ v. NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, GR No. 164527, 2007-08-15
-
WALDO Q. FLORES v. ATTY. ANTONIO F. MONTEMAYOR, GR No. 170146, 2010-08-25
-
GOV. LUIS RAYMUND F. VILLAFUERTE v. JESSE M. ROBREDO, GR No. 195390, 2014-12-10
-
BANTAY REPUBLIC ACT OR BA-RA 7941 v. COMELEC, GR No. 177271, 2007-05-04
SEPARATION OF POWERS
-
JOSE A. ANGARA v. THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION, GR No. 45081, 1936-07-15
-
ERNESTO B. FRANCISCO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, GR No. 160261, 2003-11-10
-
SANLAKAS v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SECRETARY ANGELO REYES, GR No. 159085, 2004-02-03
-
CONGRESSMAN ENRIQUE T. GARCIA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, GR No. 100883, 1991-12-02
-
MARIA CAROLINA P. ARAULLO v. BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, GR No. 209287, 2015-02-03
-
Read the separate opinion of Justice Corona: LOUIS 'BAROK' C. BIRAOGO v. PHILIPPINE TRUTH COMMISSION OF 2010, GR No. 192935, 2010-12-07
-
ROMULO L. NERI v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS, GR No. 180643, 2008-03-25 Read also the dissenting opinion of Justice Puno.
-
MICHAEL L. RAMA v. GILBERT P. MOISES, GR No. 197146, 2016-12-06
CHECKS AND BALANCES
-
JOSE A. ANGARA v. THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION, GR No. 45081, 1936-07-15
-
JOSUE JAVELLANA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, GR No. L-36142, 1973-03-31
-
MICHAEL L. RAMA v. GILBERT P. MOISES, GR No. 197146, 2016-12-06
-
RAMON A. GONZALES v. COMELEC, GR No. L-28196 & L-28224, 1967-11-09
-
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. PAQUITO OCHOA, GR No. 204605, 2016-07-19
-
ERNESTO R. RODRIGUEZ v. CARLOS QUIRINO, GR No. L-19800, 1963-10-28
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
DELEGATION OF POWERS
-
QUEZON CITY PTCA FEDERATION v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GR No. 188720, 2016-02-23
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
-
ALFEO D. VIVAS v. MONETARY BOARD OF BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS, GR No. 191424, 2013-08-07
-
1-UNITED TRANSPORT KOALISYON v. COMELEC, GR No. 206020, 2015-04-14
-
ELISEO F. SORIANO v. MA. CONSOLIZA P. LAGUARDIA, GR No. 164785, 2009-04-29
-
PHILIPPINE COCONUT PRODUCERS FEDERATION v. REPUBLIC, GR Nos. 177857-58, 2009-09-17
FORMS OF GOVERNMENT
-
MACTAN CEBU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. FERDINAND J. MARCOS, GR No. 120082, 1996-09-11
-
CO KIM CHAM v. EUSEBIO VALDEZ TAN KEH, GR No. L-5., 1945-09-17
-
JOSEPH E. ESTRADA v. ANIANO DESIERTO, GR Nos. 146710-15, 2001-03-02
III. LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT
A. WHO MAY EXERCISE LEGISLATIVE POWER
1. Congress
The legislative power shall be vested in the Congress of the Philippines which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Carpio: GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
-
YAZAKI TORRES MANUFACTURING v. CA, GR NO. 130584, 2006-06-27
-
PROF. RANDOLF S. DAVID v. GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, GR NO. 171396, 2006-05-03
-
NESTOR G. ATITIW v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA, GR No. 143374, 2005-09-30
-
BAYAN v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY RONALDO ZAMORA, GR No. 138570, 2000-10-10
2. Regional/Local Legislative Power
-
DIOSDADO LAGCAO v. JUDGE GENEROSA G. LABRA, GR No. 155746, 2004-10-13
-
RAMON M. ATIENZA v. JOSE T. VILLAROSA, GR NO. 161081, 2005-05-10
-
ROMEO J. GAMBOA v. MARCELO AGUIRRE, GR No. 134213, 1999-07-20
3. People s Initiative On Statutes (Initiative And Referendum)
-
MIRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO v. COMELEC, GR No. 127325, 1997-03-19
-
SUBIC BAY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY v. COMELEC, GR No. 125416, 1996-09-26
B. HOUSES OF CONGRESS
1. Senate
-
SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY v. DANGEROUS DRUGS BOARD, GR No. 157870, 2008-11-03
-
VICTORINO DENNIS M. SOCRATES v. COMELEC, GR No. 154512, 2002-11-12
2. House of Representatives
-
ANICETO G. SALUDO v. AMERICAN EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL, GR NO. 159507, 2006-04-19
-
ANTONIO BENGSON III v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No. 142840, 2001-05-07
-
IMELDA ROMUALDEZ-MARCOS v. COMELEC, GR No. 119976, 1995-09-18
-
SENATOR BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III v. COMELEC, GR No. 189793, 2010-04-07
-
RODOLFO G. NAVARRO v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EDUARDO ERMITA, GR No. 180050, 2010-02-10
-
SILVERIO R.TAGOLINO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No. 202202, 2013-03-19
-
JOCELYN SY LIMKAICHONG v. COMELEC, GR Nos. 178831-32, 2009-04-01
Three-term limit rule
-
Read the concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice BrionMAYOR BARBARA RUBY C. TALAGA v. COMELEC, GR No. 196804, 2012-10-09
-
VICTORINO DENNIS M. SOCRATES v. COMELEC, GR No. 154512, 2002-11-12
Voluntary renunciation of the office
-
ROMEO LONZANIDA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTION, GR No. 135150, 1999-07-28
-
FEDERICO T. MONTEBON v. COMMISSION ON ELECTION, GR No. 180444, 2008-04-09
A) District Representatives And Questions Of Apportionment
-
ARANGAY ASSOCIATION FOR NATIONAL ADVANCEMENT v. COMELEC, GR No. 179271, 2009-04-21
-
SENATOR BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III v. COMELEC, GR No. 189793, 2010-04-07
B) Party-List System (R.A. No. 7941}
-
COCOFED-PHILIPPINE COCONUT PRODUCERS FEDERATION v. COMELEC, GR No. 207026, 2013-08-06
provisions of the law must not be read in isolation but as a whole, as the law must not be read in truncated... parts; its provisions in relation to the whole law and every part thereof must be considered in fixing the meaning of any of its parts in order to produce a harmonious whole. -
AKSYON MAGSASAKA-PARTIDO TINIG NG MASA v. COMELEC, GR No. 207134, 2015-06-16
-
PHILIPPINE GUARDIANS BROTHERHOOD v. COMELEC, GR No. 190529, 2010-04-29
-
ANG LADLAD LGBT PARTY REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS CHAIR v. COMELEC, GR No. 190582, 2010-04-08
-
BARANGAY ASSOCIATION FOR NATIONAL ADVANCEMENT v. COMELEC, GR No. 179271, 2009-07-08
C) LEGISLATIVE PRIVILEGES, INHIBITIONS AND DISQUALIFICATIONS
The salaries of Senators and Members of the House of Representatives shall be determined by law. No increase in said compensation shall take effect until after the expiration of the full term of all the Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives approving such increase.
A Senator or Member of the House of Representatives shall, in all offenses punishable by not more than six years imprisonment, be privileged from arrest while the Congress is in session.
No Member shall be questioned nor be held liable in any other place for any speech or debate in the Congress or in any committee thereof.
-
ANTERO J. POBRE v. SEN. MIRIAM DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO, AC. No. 7399, 2009-08-25
-
NICANOR T. JIMENEZ v. BARTOLOME CABANGBANG, GR No. L-15905, 1966-08-03
INCOMPATIBLE OFFICE - No Senator or Member of the House of Representatives may hold any other office or employment in the Government, or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries, during his term without forfeiting his seat.
-
DANTE V. LIBAN v. RICHARD J. GORDON, GR No. 175352, 2009-07-15; Read also the dissenting opinion of Justice Nachura.
-
HOMOBONO A. ADAZA v. FERNANDO PACANA, GR No. 68159, 1985-03-18
-
DANTE V. LIBAN v. RICHARD J. GORDON, GR No. 175352, 2011-01-18
He shall not intervene in any matter before any office of the Government for his pecuniary benefit or where he may be called upon to act on account of his office.
D. QUORUM AND VOTING MAJORITIES
E. DISCIPLINE OF MEMBERS
Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all its Members, suspend or expel a Member. A penalty of suspension, when imposed, shall not exceed sixty days.
F. ELECTORAL TRIBUNALS AND THE COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS
Electoral Tribunals
-
JOSE A. ANGARA v. THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION, GR No. 45081, 1936-07-15
-
DR. EMIGDIO A. BONDOC v. REPRESENTATIVES MARCIANO M. PINEDA, GR No. 97710, 1991-09-26
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Leonen: PHILIP A. AGUINALDO v. HIS EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, GR No. 224302, 2016-11-29
-
HARLIN C. ABAYON v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No. 222236, 2016-05-03
-
MARY ELIZABETH TY-DELGADO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No. 219603, 2016-01-26
-
SILVERIO R.TAGOLINO v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No. 202202, 2013-03-19
-
ATTY. ISIDRO Q. LICO v. COMELEC EN BANC, GR No. 205505, 2015-09-29
Commission on Appointments
-
TEOFISTO T. GUINGONA v. NEPTALI A. GONZALES, GR No. 106971, 1993-03-01
-
REP. RAUL A. DAZA v. REP. LUIS C. SINGSON, GR No. 86344, 1989-12-21
-
ULPIANO P. SARMIENTO III v. SALVADOR MISON, GR No. 79974, 1987-12-17
G. POWERS OF CONGRESS
1. Legislative
Legislative Power
-
BANK OF COMMERCE v. PLANTERS DEVELOPMENT BANK, GR Nos. 154470-71, 2012-09-24
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
YAZAKI TORRES MANUFACTURING v. CA, GR NO. 130584, 2006-06-27
-
NESTOR G. ATITIW v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA, GR No. 143374, 2005-09-30
-
SOCIAL JUSTICE SOCIETY v. DANGEROUS DRUGS BOARD, GR No. 157870, 2008-11-03
Police Power
Power of Taxation
-
TRIDHARMA MARKETING CORPORATION v. CTA, SECOND DIVISION, GR No. 215950, 2016-06-20
-
PHILIPPINE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS v. CIR, GR No. 167330, 2009-09-18
-
MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY ASSESSOR, GR No. 166102, 2015-08-05
-
BATANGAS CITY v. PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, GR No. 187631, 2015-07-08
Contempt Power
-
JEAN L. ARNAULT v. EUSTAQUIO BALAGTAS, GRNo. L-6749, 1955-07-30
-
ROMULO L. NERI v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS, GR No. 180643, 2008-09-04
A) Legislative Inquiries And The Oversight Functions
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
AQUILINO Q. PIMENTEL v. SENATE COMMITTEE OF WHOLE, GR No. 187714, 2011-03-08
-
ROMULO L. NERI v. SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS, GR No. 180643, 2008-09-04
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
-
LEAVE DIVISION v. WILMA SALVACION P. HEUSDENS, AM No. P-11-2927, 2011-12-13
-
SENATE OF PHILIPPINES v. EDUARDO R. ERMITA, GR NO. 169777, 2006-04-20
B) Bicameral Conference Committee
-
ARTURO M. TOLENTINO v. SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No. 115455, 1994-08-25
-
JOKER P. ARROYO v. JOSE DE VENECIA, GR No. 127255, 1997-08-14
C) Limitations On Legislative Power
Every bill passed by the Congress shall embrace only one subject which shall be expressed in the title thereof.
-
PHILIPPINE JUDGES ASSOCIATION v. PETE PRADO, GR No. 105371, 1993-11-11
-
RODOLFO C. FARI AS v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, GR No. 147387, 2003-12-10
-
BARANGAY ASSOCIATION FOR NATIONAL ADVANCEMENT v. COMELEC, GR No. 177508, 2009-08-07
-
CONGRESSMAN JAMES L. CHIONGBIAN v. OSCAR M. ORBOS, GR No. 96754, 1995-06-22
-
NESTOR G. ATITIW v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA, GR No. 143374, 2005-09-30
-
ROBERT V. TOBIAS v. CITY MAYOR BENJAMIN S. ABALOS, GR No. 114783, 1994-12-08
No bill passed by either House shall become a law unless it has passed three readings on separate days, and printed copies thereof in its final form have been distributed to its Members three days before its passage, except when the President certifies to the necessity of its immediate enactment to meet a public calamity or emergency.
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
JAIME N. SORIANO v. SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No. 184450, 2017-01-24
-
ARTURO M. TOLENTINO v. SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No. 115455, 1995-10-30
Upon the last reading of a bill, no amendment thereto shall be allowed, and the vote thereon shall be taken immediately thereafter, and the yeas and nays entered in the Journal.
The rule of taxation shall be uniform and equitable.
-
MACTAN CEBU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. FERDINAND J. MARCOS, GR No. 120082, 1996-09-11
-
ARTURO M. TOLENTINO v. SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No. 115455, 1995-10-30
-
CIR v. FORTUNE TOBACCO CORPORATION, GR No. 180006, 2011-09-28
-
FRANCISCO I. CHAVEZ v. PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT, GR No. 130716, 1998-12-09
Congress shall evolve a progressive system of taxation.
-
BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO v. JOSE ISIDRO N. CAMACHO, GR No. 163583, 2009-04-15
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
ARTURO M. TOLENTINO v. SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No. 115455, 1995-10-30
Lands, buildings, and improvements, actually, directly, and exclusively used for religious, charitable, or educational purposes shall be exempt from taxation.
-
ANGELES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION v. CITY OF ANGELES, GR No. 189999, 2012-06-27
-
LUNG CENTER OF PHILIPPINES v. QUEZON CITY, GR No. 144104, 2004-06-29
No law granting any tax exemption shall be passed without the concurrence of a majority of all the Members of the Congress.
-
JOHN HAY PEOPLES ALTERNATIVE COALITION v. VICTOR LIM, GR No. 119775, 2003-10-24
-
FRANCISCO I. CHAVEZ v. PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT, GR No. 130716, 1998-12-09
No money shall be paid out of the Treasury except in pursuance of an appropriation made by law.
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
-
ALROBEN J. GOH v. LUCILO R. BAYRON, GR No. 212584, 2014-11-25
-
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS v. RONALDO E. QUIWA, GR No. 183444, 2011-10-12
-
LOUIS 'BAROK' C. BIRAOGO v. PHILIPPINE TRUTH COMMISSION OF 2010, GR No. 192935, 2010-12-07
-
STRATEGIC ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. RADSTOCK SECURITIES LIMITED, GR No. 178158, 2009-12-04
-
Read the dissenting opinion of Justice Carpio: ROLEX SUPLICO v. NATIONAL ECONOMIC, GR No. 178830, 2008-07-14
(i) Limitations On Revenue, Appropriations And Tariff Measures
All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills authorizing increase of public debt, bills of local application, and private bills shall originate exclusively in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments.
-
ARTURO M. TOLENTINO v. SECRETARY OF FINANCE, GR No. 115455, 1994-08-25
-
SENATOR HEHERSON T. ALVAREZ v. TEOFISTO T. GUINGONA, GR No. 118303, 1996-01-31
The Congress may not increase the appropriations recommended by the President for the operation of the Government as specified in the budget. The form, content, and manner of preparation of the budget shall be prescribed by law.
-
DRIANITA BAGAOISAN v. NATIONAL TOBACCO ADMINISTRATION, GR No. 152845, 2003-08-05
-
Read the concurring opinion of Justice Carpio: GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
No provision or enactment shall be embraced in the general appropriations bill unless it relates specifically to some particular appropriation therein. Any such provision or enactment shall be limited in its operation to the appropriation to which it relates.
-
NESTOR G. ATITIW v. RONALDO B. ZAMORA, GR No. 143374, 2005-09-30
-
PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION v. SALVADOR ENRIQUEZ, GR No. 113105, 1994-08-19
-
NEPTALI A. GONZALES v. CATALINO MACARAIG, GR No. 87636, 1990-11-19
No law shall be passed authorizing any transfer of appropriations; however, the President, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the heads of Constitutional Commissions may, by law, be authorized to augment any item in the general appropriations law for their respective offices from savings in other items of their respective appropriations.
-
MARIA CAROLINA P. ARAULLO v. BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, GR No. 209287, 2015-02-03
-
MARIA CAROLINA P. ARAULLO v. BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, GR No. 209287, 2014-07-01
The doctrine of operative fact recognizes the existence of the law or executive act prior to the determination of its unconstitutionality as an operative fact that produced consequences that cannot always be erased, ignored or disregarded. In short, it nullifies the void law or... executive act but sustains its effects. It provides an exception to the general rule that a void or unconstitutional law produces no effect.
But its use must be subjected to great scrutiny and circumspection, and it cannot be invoked to validate an... unconstitutional law or executive act, but is resorted to only as a matter of equity and fair play.
It applies only to cases where extraordinary circumstances exist, and only when the extraordinary circumstances have met the stringent conditions that... will permit its application.
To be clear, the doctrine of operative fact extends to a void or unconstitutional executive act. The term executive act is broad enough to include any and all acts of the Executive, including those that are quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial in nature.
Contrarily, the term 'executive act' is broad enough to encompass decisions of administrative bodies and agencies under the executive department which are subsequently revoked by the agency in question or nullified by the Court.
-
BRENDA L. NAZARETH v. REYNALDO A. VILLAR, GR No. 188635, 2013-01-29
-
ALROBEN J. GOH v. LUCILO R. BAYRON, GR No. 212584, 2014-11-25
-
NEPTALI A. GONZALES v. CATALINO MACARAIG, GR No. 87636, 1990-11-19
(ii) Presidential Veto And Congressional Override
-
CESAR BENGZON v. FRANKLIN N. DRILON, GR No. 103524, 1992-04-15
-
GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA v. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, GR No. 208566, 2013-11-19
-
NEPTALI A. GONZALES v. CATALINO MACARAIG, GR No. 87636, 1990-11-19
-
ABAKADA GURO PARTY LIST * OFFICERS v. CESAR V. PURISIMA, GR No. 166715, 2008-08-14
-
PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION v. SALVADOR ENRIQUEZ, GR No. 113105, 1994-08-19