Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/ce2db?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PACIFIC COMMERCIAL COMPANY v. ANTONIO CAMPOS RUEDA](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/ce2db?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:ce2db}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show opinions
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 21101, Nov 12, 1923 ]

PACIFIC COMMERCIAL COMPANY v. ANTONIO CAMPOS RUEDA +

DECISION

52 Phil. 983

[ G.R. No. 21101, November 12, 1923 ]

PACIFIC COMMERCIAL COMPANY, ASIATIC PETROLEUM COMPANY (P. I.), LTD., AND INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONERS AND APPELLANTS, VS. ANTONIO CAMPOS RUEDA AND JOSE CAMPOS RUEDA, PARTNERS AND APPELLEES.

D E C I S I O N

ROMUALDEZ, J.:

The petitioners appeal from an order of the Court of First Instance of Manila setting aside a previous order which directed the receiver to take possession of the books, papers, and private property of the partners, and prohibited the payment to the latter of their private credits, and the collection of their debts.

The appellants contend that with the annulment of said order, judgment of this court of August 28, 1922, in case G. R. No. 18703 becomes ineffective.[1]

Such a conclusion is untenable, considering that the pronouncement prayed for and made in said case G. R. No. 18703 was one declaring insolvent the partnership Campos Rueda & Co., the partners not having been individually summoned or heard in that proceeding.

The order appealed from is hereby affirmed, with the costs against the appellants. So ordered.

Johnson, Street, Malcolm, Avanceña, Villamor, and Johns, JJ., concur.



[1] Campos Rueda & Co. vs. Pacific Commercial Co., 44 Phil., 916.

tags