Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2c2b?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[MANUEL S. RUSTIA v. AGUINALDO](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2c2b?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2c2b}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 48928, Sep 05, 1946 ]

MANUEL S. RUSTIA v. AGUINALDO +

DECISION

G.R. No. 48928

[ G.R. No. 48928, September 05, 1946 ]

MANUEL S. RUSTIA VS. AGUINALDO & AGUINALDO.

D E C I S I O N

In a decision promulgated March 31, 1944, the Supreme Court affirmed a judgment of the Court of First Instance which was for all the plaintiffs including M. In a resolution of the Supreme Court dated September 3, 1943, final determination of the case was suspended with respect to M, an American. On November 14, 1945, M filed a petition praying that the decision of the Supreme Court be extended to include M as one of the original plaintiffs-appellees. No objection was received from defendant's attorney. Held: The decision of the Court of First Instance ordering the defendant to pay M the value of the judgment as modified by the Supreme Court, is affirmed.

tags