Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c236d?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[IN MATTER OF INTESTATE ESTATE F BENIGNA SANTOS v. MATEA FELIX DE CUSTODIO](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c236d?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c236d}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 41023, Aug 20, 1934 ]

IN MATTER OF INTESTATE ESTATE F BENIGNA SANTOS v. MATEA FELIX DE CUSTODIO +

DECISION

G. R. No. 41023

[ G. R. No. 41023, August 20, 1934 ]

IN THE MATTER OF THE INTESTATE ESTATE F BENIGNA SANTOS, DECEASED, CC. VIANA ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLEES, VS. MATEA FELIX DE CUSTODIO, ADMINISTRATOR AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________29th__________ day of __________September_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.


tags