Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c22bd?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[SANTIAGO CABACTULAN ET AL. v. MODESTO DADO ET AL.](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c22bd?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c22bd}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 39611, Jul 25, 1934 ]

SANTIAGO CABACTULAN ET AL. v. MODESTO DADO ET AL. +

DECISION

G. R. No. 39611

[ G. R. No. 39611, July 25, 1934 ]

SANTIAGO CABACTULAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. MODESTO DADO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPEELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________9th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Misamis Oriental________, dated the __________8th__________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Cost against appellants.

It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from ___________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

 


 


tags