Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c22b8?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[GERMAN v. HACIENDA BENITO](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c22b8?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c22b8}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 39588, Jul 16, 1934 ]

GERMAN v. HACIENDA BENITO +

DECISION

G. R. No. 39588

[ G. R. No. 39588, July 16, 1934 ]

GERMAN & CO., LTD., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. HACIENDA BENITO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________27th__________ day of __________February_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, modified and judgment is hereby entered in the sum of P7,255.41 with interest thereon at 6% from 12th day of May, 1932, without prejudice to any action of accounting that may be had in connection with the milling contract fated the 3rd of February, 1932. No expression as to costs.

It is further ordered that __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.

 


tags