Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2297?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[PEOPLE v. LUIS SANTIAGO ET AL.](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2297?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2297}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 38677, Jul 30, 1934 ]

PEOPLE v. LUIS SANTIAGO ET AL. +

DECISION

G. R. No. 38677

[ G. R. No. 38677, July 30, 1934 ]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LUIS SANTIAGO ET AL., DEFENDANTS, LUIS SANTIAGO, TEODORO DAVID AND ALEJANDRO ESPINOLA, DEFENDANTSAND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________14th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bataan________, dated the __________15th__________ day of _________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed as to Luis Santiago, and, in accordance with the provisions of the indeterminate Sentence Law, Act 4103, the judgment is hereby modified by sentencing the appellant to an indeterminate period of imprisonment running from a minimum of 1 month and 1 day, arresto mayor, to 1 year and 8 months, prision correocional, with the penalties accessory thereto. The judgment requiring indemnification by this appellant to Melchora Austria in the amount of two thousand pesos is affirmed. The two other accused, Teodoro David and Alejandro Espinola, are absolved from the complaint, with one third of the costs of this appeal and one, fourth of the costs of the trial in first instance against Luis Santiago. The costs to the accused who are acquitted will be de oficio in both instances. One third of the costs of this appeal amount to 58.00 for the collection of which the trial judge shall proceed by summary proceedings.

It is further ordered that the said cause be remanded to the Court of First Instance.


tags