Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2201?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[DOMINGO CANSINO v. LEONARDA GUZMAN ET AL.](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c2201?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c2201}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 38836, Jun 18, 1934 ]

DOMINGO CANSINO v. LEONARDA GUZMAN ET AL. +

DECISION

G. R. No. 38836

[ G. R. No. 38836, June 18, 1934 ]

DOMINGO CANSINO, ET AL., APPLICANTS AND APPELLEES, VS. LEONARDA GUZMAN ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________30th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed  with the costs against the appellants.

It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.


tags