Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21fa?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[MAXIMO LIOANAG APPLICANT v. DIONISIO L. MOSTAJO ET AL.](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21fa?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c21fa}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 38667, Jun 29, 1934 ]

MAXIMO LIOANAG APPLICANT v. DIONISIO L. MOSTAJO ET AL. +

DECISION

G. R. No. 38667

[ G. R. No. 38667, June 29, 1934 ]

MAXIMO LIOANAG APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. DIONISIO L. MOSTAJO ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________13th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________21st__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement as to cost. in this instance.

It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.


tags