Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21ec?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[ANACLETO DE GUZMAN v. IRINEO DE GUZMAN](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21ec?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c21ec}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 37746, Jun 23, 1934 ]

ANACLETO DE GUZMAN v. IRINEO DE GUZMAN +

DECISION

G. R. No. 37746

[ G. R. No. 37746, June 23, 1934 ]

ANACLETO DE GUZMAN, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. IRINEO DE GUZMAN @ ESTO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________7th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________17th__________ day of _________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with cost s against the appellant.

It is further ordered that the __________appellee__________ from the __________appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.


tags