Add TAGS to your cases to easily locate them or to build your SYLLABUS.
Please SIGN IN to use this feature.
https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21ca?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09
[GRACIANO HAYA v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CASIGURAN](https://lawyerly.ph/juris/view/c21ca?user=fbGU2WFpmaitMVEVGZ2lBVW5xZ2RVdz09)
{case:c21ca}
Highlight text as FACTS, ISSUES, RULING, PRINCIPLES to generate case DIGESTS and REVIEWERS.
Please LOGIN use this feature.
Show printable version with highlights

[ GR No. 41810, May 29, 1934 ]

GRACIANO HAYA v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CASIGURAN +

DECISION

G. R. No. 41810

[ G. R. No. 41810, May 29, 1934 ]

GRACIANO HAYA, PETITIONER VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CASIGURAN, SORSOGON, RESPONDENT.

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________29th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Sorsogon________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.

It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________xx the sum of Pxx__________xx , as costs.


tags