source: http://www.lawyerly.ph

[ GR No. 39383, May 16, 1934 ]

GREGORIO ATIENZA v. ENRIQUE BAUTISTA +

DECISION

G. R. No. 39383

[ G. R. No. 39383, May 16, 1934 ]

GREGORIO ATIENZA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ENRIQUE BAUTISTA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________6th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs.

It is further ordered that ______xx__________xx__________xx______ recover from __________xx__________xx__________xx the sum of P__xx__, as costs.


tags