Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

	GR No. 218787 2015-12-08	LEO Y. QUERUBIN v. COMELEC EN BANC VELASCO JR., J.
that the alleged defect in SMTC's AOI is of no moment since neither the law nor the bidding documents require a bidder to submit its AOI;[42] that even assuming for the sake of argument that SMTC's primary purpose precludes it from further contracting for the automation of the Philippine elections beyond 2010, its secondary purposes[43] and Sec. 42 of BP 68[44] authorize the company to do so;[45] and that the COMELEC, in fact, has already dealt with SMTC numerous times after the 2010 elections.[46]