Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 116526 2004-03-23	CARMEN SORIANO VDA. DE DABAO v. CA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY SIX PESOS (P1,639,746.00), exclusive of taxes paid by the BANK which must also be paid back to said BANK. The latter BANK is therefore directed to allow and grant such redemption of the subject property under the said amount. (Emphasis supplied) IT IS SO ORDERED.[13]
	GR No. 116526 2004-03-23	CARMEN SORIANO VDA. DE DABAO v. CA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
faith.[15] A verification from the Court of Appeals of the records of CA-G.R. CV No. 60399 discloses the following:
	GR No. 116526 2004-03-23	CARMEN SORIANO VDA. DE DABAO v. CA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Said decision had become final and executory as of May 7, 2003, per the Entry of Judgment issued by the Clerk of Court.[18] In view of the said final and executory decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 60399 of which we take judicial notice by virtue of Sections 1 and 2 of Rule 129 of the Rules of Court,[19] the instant petition had become moot and
	GR No. 116526 2004-03-23	CARMEN SORIANO VDA. DE DABAO v. CA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
SO ORDERED.[17] (Emphasis supplied).