You're currently signed in as:
User

DOHLE-PHILMAN MANNING AGENCY v. HEIRS OF ANDRES G. GAZZINGAN

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2015-11-25
MENDOZA, J.
This disputable presumption, however, does not signify an automatic grant of compensation and/or benefits claim.[19] "Concomitant with this presumption is the burden placed upon the claimant to present substantial evidence that his work conditions caused or at least increased the risk of contracting the disease and only a reasonable proof of work-connection, not direct causal relation is required to establish compensability of illnesses not included in the list of occupational diseases."[20]