This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-03-12 |
|||||
| In Gonzales v. Court of Appeals,[43] we held that an agricultural leasehold cannot be established on land which has ceased to be devoted to cultivation or farming because of its conversion into a residential subdivision. Petitioners were not agricultural lessees or tenants of the land before its conversion into a residential subdivision in 1955. Not having been dispossessed by the conversion of the land into a residential subdivision, they may not claim a right to reinstatement.[44] | |||||