This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-02-09 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| On September 12, 1978, Camacho filed a Motion to Dismiss[27] the Complaint-in-Intervention filed by Atty. Banzon on the ground that the jurisdiction of the court to try the case ceased to exist because the principal action had been terminated. The RTC denied the motion in its Order[28] dated March 16, 1979. It held that Atty. Banzon had an interest over the subject property which he had to protect and that the compromise agreement between Camacho and Tuazon did not include him. Moreover, the dismissal of the intervention would not achieve its purpose of avoiding multiplicity of suits. The propriety of the denial of Camacho's motion to dismiss was finally settled by this Court in Camacho v. Court of Appeals[29] where this Court affirmed the denial of the motion. | |||||