This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2016-01-20 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| There are two consequences of a finding on appeal that indispensable parties have not been joined. First, all subsequent actions of the lower courts are null and void for lack of jurisdiction.[128] Second, the case should be remanded to the trial court for the inclusion of indispensable parties. It is only upon the plaintiff's refusal to comply with an order to join indispensable parties that the case may be dismissed.[129] | |||||
|
2016-01-20 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| In Divinagracia v. Parilla,[135] Macawadib v. Philippine National Police Directorate for Personnel and Records Management,[136] People v. Go,[137] and Valdez-Tallorin v. Heirs of Tarona,[138] among others, this court annulled judgments rendered by lower courts in the absence of indispensible parties. | |||||