Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 6 times or more.

	GR No. 205956 2014-02-12	P & SUPT. HANSEL M. MARANTAN v. ATTY. JOSE MANUEL DIOKNO MENDOZA, J.
The power of contempt is inherent in all courts in order to allow them to conduct their business unhampered by publications and comments which tend to impair the impartiality of their decisions or otherwise obstruct the administration of justice. As important as the maintenance of freedom of speech, is the maintenance of the independence of the Judiciary. The "clear and present danger" rule may serve as an aid in determining the proper constitutional boundary between these two rights.[10]
	AM No. 10-10-4-SC 2011-03-08	UP LAW FACULTY'S STATEMENT ON PLAGIARISM ALLEGATIONS LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
My attention was called to the Judgment and the issue of possible plagiarism by the Philippine chapter of the Southeast Asia Media Legal Defence Initiative (SEAMLDI),[19] an affiliate of the London-based Media Legal Defence Initiative (MLDI), where I sit as trustee.
	AM No. 10-10-4-SC 2011-03-08	UP LAW FACULTY'S STATEMENT ON PLAGIARISM ALLEGATIONS LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Dr. Mark Ellis[20]
	GR No. 170516 2008-07-16	AKBAYAN v. AQUINO CARPIO MORALES, J.
over a constitutional right in order to preserve an ordered society, such as when there is a "clear and present danger" of a substantive evil that the State has a right to prevent as demonstrated in free speech cases,[272] or when there is a "compelling state interest" that must override the free exercise of religion.[273]