Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR NO. 159950 2007-02-12	JOEL P. GONZALES v. PEOPLE QUISUMBING, J.
The OSG rebuts petitioner's dependence on the case of People v. Acosta,[8] where the court held that evidence that one did or did not do a certain thing at one time is not admissible to prove that he did or did not do the same or similar thing at another time, but, it may be received to prove a specific intent or knowledge, identity, plan, system, habit, custom or usage.
	GR Nos. 111734-35 2000-06-16	PEOPLE v. FERNANDO A. MALAPAYON PARDO, J.
To justify conviction upon circumstantial evidence, the combination of circumstantial evidence must leave no reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused.[44] From the aforementioned circumstances, a fair and logical conclusion--that Mercedita participated in the crime of kidnapping Wilhelmina for ransom can be reached.