This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2001-09-17 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
| GSIS submits that there must be proof of pecuniary loss. This is untenable. The rationale behind temperate damages is precisely that from the nature of the case, definite proof of pecuniary loss cannot be offered. When the court is convinced that there has been such loss, the judge is empowered to calculate moderate damages, rather than let the complainant suffer without redress from the defendant's wrongful act.[35] | |||||