This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2008-07-28 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| Nonetheless, the evidence adduced by petitioner was insufficient to prove that he was the de jure tenant of the subject land. The requisites of a tenancy relationship are: (1) the parties are the landowner and the tenant; (2) the subject land is agricultural; (3) there is consent by the landowner; (4) the purpose is agricultural production; (5) there is personal cultivation and (6) there is a sharing of the harvest.[21] | |||||
|
2005-12-16 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| The element that the parties must be the landowner and the tenant or agricultural lessee, on which all other requisites of the tenancy agreement depends, is absent in this case. Tenancy relationship can only be created with the consent of the true and lawful landholder who is either the owner, lessee, usufructuary or legal possessor of the land, and not thru the acts of the supposed landholder who has no right to the land subject of the tenancy.[26] | |||||
|
2005-06-21 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| All these essential requisites are necessary to establish tenancy relationship. Unless a person has established his status as a de jure tenant, he is not entitled to security of tenure nor is he covered by the Land Reform Program of the Government under existing tenancy laws.[22] | |||||