You're currently signed in as:
User

CONCEPCION SUDARIO ET AL v. ACRO TAXI CAB CO.

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2000-03-27
PARDO, J.
On July 30, 1998 petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration but the court denied the same.[7] On September 14, 1998, petitioner filed with the Court of Appeals a petition for certiorari.[8] On September 23, 1998 the Court of Appeals promulgated its decision denying the petition, the dispositive portion of which reads: "It appearing that the accompanying copy of the questioned orders of the Regional Trial Court of the National Capital Judicial Region, Branch 28, Manila, dated July 3, 1998 and August 10, 1998 in this petition for CERTIORARI with Prayer for a Temporary Restraining Order, is an UNSIGNED duplicate copy (Rollo, p. 10) not a clearly legible duplicate original, nor a certified true copy thereof, the instant PETITION is hereby ordered DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 65, Sec. 1, in conjunction with Rule 56, Section 2, and Rule 46, Section 3, of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended."[9]