This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2014-11-10 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| The amendment of the technical description of the property, or the reduction of the area from 12,896 to 12,776 square meters, does not require a republication of the technical description, because the amended area was already included during the first publication. As this Court held in Republic v. CA and Heirs of Luis Ribaya:[17] | |||||
|
2006-08-30 |
AZCUNA, J. |
||||
| At the outset, it must be emphasized that an action for reversion filed by the State to recover property registered in favor of any party which is part of the public forest or of a forest reservation never prescribes. Verily, non-disposable public lands registered under the Land Registration Act may be recovered by the State at any time[17] and the defense of res judicata would not apply as courts have no jurisdiction to dispose of such lands of the public domain.[18] That being said, it must likewise be kept in mind that in an action to annul a judgment, the burden of proving the judgment's nullity rests upon the petitioner. The petitioner has to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the judgment being challenged is fatally defective.[19] | |||||
|
2005-05-26 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| A land registration case is a proceeding in rem,[28] and jurisdiction in rem cannot be acquired unless there be constructive seizure of the land through publication and service of notice.[29] | |||||