This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-07-29 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Furthermore, this Court has declared that the appointment of a receiver is not proper when the rights of the parties, one of whom is in possession of the property, depend on the determination of their respective claims to the title of such property[24] unless such property is in danger of being materially injured or lost, as by the prospective foreclosure of a mortgage on it or its portions are being occupied by third persons claiming adverse title.[25] | |||||