This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-10-21 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| While it is true that there was no direct evidence to establish that appellants had carnal knowledge of AAA as the latter was unconscious, however, proof of the commission of the crime need not always be by direct evidence, for circumstantial evidence could also sufficiently and competently establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt.[41] Indeed, the Court had affirmed convictions for rape based on circumstantial evidence.[42] | |||||