This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-03-25 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Accordingly, in a number of subsequent rulings,[19] this Court consistently deemed it appropriate to reiterate the pronouncements in T.A.N. Properties in denying applications for registration on the ground of failure to prove the alienable and disposable nature of the land subject therein. In said cases, it has been repeatedly ruled that certifications issued by the CENRO, or specialists of the DENR, as well as Survey Plans prepared by the DENR containing annotations that the subject lots are alienable, do not constitute incontrovertible evidence to overcome the presumption that the property sought to be registered belongs to the inalienable public domain. Rather, this Court stressed the importance of proving alienability by presenting a copy of the original classification of the land approved by the DENR Secretary and certified as true copy by the legal custodian of the official records.[20] | |||||
|
2015-02-02 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Possession dates back to June 12, 1945 or earlier.[6] | |||||