You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

BERNARD A. TENAZAS v. R. VILLEGAS TAXI TRANSPORT

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 204944-45
2014-12-03
FUJI TELEVISION NETWORK v. ARLENE S. ESPIRITU
LEONEN, J.
[t]here is no hard and fast rule designed to establish the aforesaid elements. Any competent and relevant evidence to prove the relationship may be admitted. Identification cards, cash vouchers, social security registration, appointment letters or employment contracts, payrolls, organization charts, and personnel lists, serve as evidence of employee status.[135]
GR No. 204944-45
2014-12-03
FUJI TELEVISION NETWORK v. ARLENE S. ESPIRITU
LEONEN, J.
In labor cases, the quantum of proof required is substantial evidence.[136] "Substantial evidence" has been defined as "such amount of relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to justify a conclusion."[137]