This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-06-12 |
PUNO, CJ. |
||||
| Petitioner filed a petition for certiorari[14] with this Court asserting that the NLRC First Division committed grave abuse of discretion in ignoring the mandate of G.R. No. 85922. Petitioner argued that, with the statement "(a)ny petitions brought against private companies will have to be brought before the appropriate agency or office of the Department of Labor and Employment," this Court laid down the law of the case and mandated that petitions against respondents PCOC and PSSC should be brought before the NLRC. By way of resolution,[15] this Court referred the case to the CA in | |||||
|
2008-06-12 |
PUNO, CJ. |
||||
| x x x the petitioner will now be in a dilemna (sic) for the reason, that the charter creating PAGCOR expressly exempts it from the coverage of the Civil Service Laws and therefore the petitioner, will now be in a quandary whether it will be allowed to prosecute its case against PAGCOR before the Civil Service Commission while its own charter expressly exempts it from the coverage of the Civil Service Law x x x[18] | |||||