This case has been cited 1 times or more.
2015-09-30 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
This court has held that implied repeals are not favored, and "the failure to add a specific repealing clause indicates that the intent was not to repeal any existing law[.]"[184] The express repeal of Presidential Decree No. 1818 clearly indicates Congress' intent to replace Presidential Decree No. 1818 with Republic Act No. 8975. |