Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. JAY MONTEVIRGEN Y OZARAGA

This case has been cited 5 times or more.

	GR No. 209212 2016-02-10	PEOPLE v. ROMEL SAPITULA Y PACULAN PEREZ, J.
This testimony was corroborated by PSI Gagaoin who was strategically posted within the perimeter of the target area.[19] The result of the laboratory examination confirmed the presence of methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu on the white crystalline substance inside the plastic sachet received from the accused-appellant. The delivery of the illicit drug to the poseur-buyer and the receipt by the seller of the marked money successfully consummated the buy-bust transaction.[20]
	GR No. 200295 2015-08-19	PEOPLE v. EDGAR BOLO Y FRANCO PEREZ, J.
"Clearly, there was no hiatus or confusion in the confiscation, handling, custody [,] and examination of the shabu."[22] The sachets of shabu that were seized from accused-appellant, taken to the police station and thereat marked, then taken to the crime laboratory and subjected to a qualitative examination, and thereafter introduced as evidence against accused-appellant were the same sachets of shabu confiscated from him during the buy-bust operation and his arrest.
	GR No. 211199 2015-03-25	PEOPLE v. RANDY ROLLO Y LAGASCA PEREZ, J.
In every prosecution for illegal sale of shabu, the following elements must be sufficiently proved: (1) the identity of the buyer and the seller, the object and the consideration; and (2) the delivery of the thing sold and the payment therefor.[13]
	GR No. 206229 2015-02-04	PEOPLE v. AMY DASIGAN Y OLIVA PEREZ, J.
Clearly, there was no hiatus or confusion in the confiscation, handling, custody and examination of the shabu.[28] The shabu that was seized from accused-appellant, taken to the PDEA Office and thereat duly marked, then taken to the crime laboratory and subjected to a qualitative examination, and thereafter introduced in evidence against accused-appellant was the same shabu confiscated from accused-appellant when she was caught in flagrante delicto possessing the same.
	GR No. 200987 2014-08-20	PEOPLE v. RONALDO BAYAN Y NERI PEREZ, J.
In every prosecution for illegal sale of shabu, the following elements must be sufficiently proved: (1) the identity of the buyer and the seller, the object and the consideration; and (2) the delivery of the thing sold and the payment therefor.[12] Indeed, all these elements were duly established. Appellant was caught in flagrante delicto selling shabu through a buy-bust operation conducted by the operatives of SDEU of the Novaliches Police Station.