This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-06-18 |
REYES, J. |
||||
| First, the Court must emphasize that in a Rule 45 petition for review, only questions of law may be raised because the Court is not a trier of facts and is not to review or calibrate the evidence on record; and when supported by substantial evidence, the findings of fact by the CA are conclusive and binding on the parties and are not reviewable by this Court,[18] unless the case falls under any of the exceptions.[19] | |||||