Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. ARTURO ENRIQUEZ Y DE LOS REYES

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 209212 2016-02-10	PEOPLE v. ROMEL SAPITULA Y PACULAN PEREZ, J.
The Court has ruled in People v. Enriquez,[25] that the links that must be established in the chain of custody in a buy-bust situation are: first, the seizure and marking, if practicable, of the illegal drug recovered from the accused by the apprehending officer; second, the turnover of the illegal drug seized by the apprehending officer to the investigating officer; third, the turnover by the investigating officer of the illegal drug to the forensic chemist for laboratory examination; and fourth, the turnover and submission of the marked illegal drug seized from the forensic chemist to the court.
	GR No. 209338 2015-06-29	PEOPLE v. BIENVENIDO MIRANDA Y FELICIANO VILLARAMA, JR., J.
Fourth, the turnover and submission of the marked illegal drug seized from the forensic chemist to the court.[43]
	GR No. 199689 2014-03-12	PEOPLE v. HERMANOS CONSTANTINO LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Thus, the following links must be established in the chain of custody in a buy-bust situation: first, the seizure and marking, if practicable, of the illegal drug recovered from the accused by the apprehending officer; second, the turn over of the illegal drug seized by the apprehending officer to the investigating officer; third, the turn over by the investigating officer of the illegal drug to the forensic chemist for laboratory examination; and fourth, the turn over and submission of the marked illegal drugs seized from the forensic chemist to the court.[23]