This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2015-01-21 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| J. Leonen added that the Monsanto inclusion must also be deemed superseded by the Court's ruling in Romeo Jalosjos v. COMELEC[91] which recognized that "one who is previously convicted of a crime punishable by reclusion perpetua or reclusion temporal continues to suffer the accessory penalty of perpetual absolute disqualification even though pardoned as to the principal penalty, unless the accessory penalty shall have been expressly remitted in the pardon." | |||||
|
2015-01-21 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| So, too, this statement indicating "inclusion" must be deemed superseded by this court's 2013 pronouncement in Romeo Jalosjos v. COMELEC[164] which recognizes that "one who is previously convicted of a crime punishable by reclusion perpetua or reclusion temporal continues to suffer the accessory penalty of perpetual absolute disqualification even though pardoned as to the principal penalty, unless the said accessory penalty shall have been expressly remitted in the pardon."[165] | |||||
|
2015-01-21 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| The relation between Article 30 of the Revised Penal Code on the effects of perpetual absolute disqualification and Section 40(a) of the Local Government Code was extensively discussed in Romeo Jalosjos v. COMELEC:[236] | |||||