This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-07-29 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| However, the case at bar falls under one of the recognized exceptions to the rule, that exception being when the findings of the Labor Arbiter conflict with those of the NLRC and the Court of Appeals.[52] The conflicting findings of the Labor Arbiter, NLRC and the Court of Appeals pave the way for this Court to review factual issues even if it is exercising its function of judicial review under Rule 45.[53] | |||||
|
2015-01-28 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| Furthermore, it is well-settled that the filing by an employee of a complaint for illegal dismissal with a prayer for reinstatement is proof enough of his desire to return to work, thus, negating the employer's charge of abandonment.[29] An employee who takes steps to protest his dismissal cannot logically be said to have abandoned his work.[30] | |||||