This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-11-25 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| In view of the foregoing circumstances, the Court finds that the guilt of the petitioners was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. Doubtless, there was noncompliance with the provisions on remittances in P.D. No. 1752, as amended, but considering that there was a doubt engendered by the devolution, the Court resolves it in favor of the petitioners. As written in Ruzol v. Sandiganbayan:[25] | |||||