This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-03-23 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| No one called upon to try the facts or interpret the law in the process of dispensing justice can be infallible.[16] To hold judges for every erroneous ruling or order issued, assuming they have erred, would be nothing short of downright harassment and would make the judge's position untolerable.[17] To dismiss a judge for what may be considered as serious offenses under the Code of Judicial Conduct, there must, ideally, reliable evidence to show that the judicial acts complained of were ill-motivated, corrupt or inspired by a persistent disregard of well-known rules. | |||||