You're currently signed in as:
User

MARY LOUISE R. ANDERSON v. ENRIQUE HO

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

2014-08-18
BERSAMIN, J.
Nor should the rules of procedure be held to be for the benefit of only one side of the litigation, for they have been instituted for the sake of all.[42]
2006-06-27
GARCIA, J.
SO ORDERED.[8] (Word in bracket added.) Following the trial court's denial of his motion for reconsideration, petitioner Engaño elevated the case to the CA whereat his appellate recourse was docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 72590.