This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-04-14 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| While Judge Flores admitted that there were indeed instances of delay and attributed them to the heavy caseload of the courts he was handling, as stated by Justice Francisco, his excuse can only be given short shrift since he could have asked the Court for extension of time to resolve said incidents, which he never did. The Court is not oblivious to the heavy caseload of trial courts and usually allows reasonable extensions of time. Given Judge Flores' failure to ask for an extension to resolve the pending and due incidents before his courts, he is deemed to have incurred delay.[108] The Court held in Tañoco v. Sagun, Jr.:[109] | |||||