Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 185812 2015-01-13	MARITIME INDUSTRY AUTHORITY v. COA LEONEN, J.
In Abellanosa v. Commission on Audit,[79] this court held that: R.A. 6758 further reinforced this policy by expressly decreeing that all allowances not specifically mentioned therein, or as may be determined by the DBM, shall be deemed included in the standardized salary rates prescribed.[80]
	GR No. 195687 2014-04-14	LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES v. DAVID G. NAVAL VELASCO JR., J.
In Abellanosa v. Commission on Audit[51](Abellanosa), the Court, confronted with the similar issue of the application of Sec. 12 of the SSL with regard to the Incentive Allowance of National Housing Authority employees, held that "all allowances not specifically mentioned in [Section 12 of the SSL], or as may be determined by the DBM, shall be deemed included in the standardized salary rates prescribed."[52]