This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2002-08-21 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| the accused from probation. Due diligence should have elicited the indispensable information that Del Rosario had been superceded and that BP 76 had been modified in relevant parts. In Amandy v. People,[47] wherein the accused was sentenced to six (6) years and one (1) day, we held that PD 1990 had amended BP 76 so as to disqualify offenders sentenced to more than six (6) years as maximum term of imprisonment.[48] Clearly, as the facts demonstrate, respondent Judge wrongly granted probation to an ineligible applicant in a manner embarrassing to his vocation as judge of a court of justice. Eighth. We agree with the findings of the Investigating Justice that no evidence adequately proves the charge that OIC Clerk of Court Flor Serio conspired with respondent Judge to cause any undue injury to complainant and the other private offended parties in Crim. Case No. | |||||