Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

BANK OF PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. CA

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 210855 2015-12-09	ROLANDO S. ABADILLA v. SPS. BONIFACIO P. OBRERO AND BERNABELA N. OBRERO PERLAS-BERNABE, J.
It should be stressed that procedural rules are not to be disdained as mere technicalities that may be ignored at will to suit the convenience of a party. Adjective law is important in ensuring the effective enforcement of substantive rights through the orderly and speedy administration of justice. These rules are not intended to hamper litigants or complicate litigation but, indeed to provide for a system under which a suitor may be heard in the correct form and manner and at the prescribed time in a peaceful confrontation before a judge whose authority they acknowledge. Procedural rules have their own wholesome rationale in the orderly administration of justice. Justice has to be administered according to the Rules in order to obviate arbitrariness, caprice, or whimsicality.[37]
	GR No. 182571 2013-09-02	LIGAYA ESGUERRA v. HOLCIM PHILIPPINES REYES, J.
In Bank of the Philippine Islands v. Court of Appeals,[53] the Court held that the application of the rules must be the general rule, and the suspension or even mere relaxation of its application, is the exception. This Court may go beyond the strict application of the rules only on exceptional cases when there is truly substantial compliance with the rule.[54]
	GR No. 172590 2013-01-07	MARY LOUISE R. ANDERSON v. ENRIQUE HO DEL CASTILLO, J.
The need to abide by the Rules of Court and the procedural requirements it imposes has been constantly underscored by this Court. One of these procedural requirements is the certificate of non-forum shopping which, time and again, has been declared as basic, necessary and mandatory for procedural orderliness.[31]
	AM No. RTJ-11-2262 2011-02-09	GAUDENCIO B. PANTILO III v. JUDGE VICTOR A. CANOY VELASCO JR., J.
In BPI v. Court of Appeals, We underscored that "procedural rules have their own wholesome rationale in the orderly administration of justice. Justice has to be administered according to the Rules in order to obviate arbitrariness, caprice, or whimsicality."[17] In other words, "[r]ules of procedure are intended to ensure the orderly administration of justice and the protection of substantive rights in judicial and extrajudicial proceedings."[18] In this case, the reason of Judge Canoy is hardly persuasive enough to disregard the Rules.[19]