Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

GAUDENCIO LABRADOR v. SPS. ILDEFONSO PERLAS AND PACENCIA PERLAS AND SPS. ROGELIO POBRE AND MELINDA FOGATA POBRE

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 167880 2012-11-14	JACK ARROYO v. BOCAGO INLAND DEV'T. CORP. PERALTA, J.
At this juncture, it is best to emphasize the Court's ruling in Labrador vs. Perlas,[12] to wit: x x x As a registered owner, petitioner has a right to eject any person illegally occupying his property. This right is imprescriptible and can never be barred by laches. In Bishop v. Court of Appeals, we held, thus:
	GR No. 181368 2012-02-22	GEORGE S. TOLENTINO v. PACIFICO S. LAUREL PERALTA, J.
Petitioners' argument that an accion publiciana is not the proper remedy available for the respondents, because more than ten (10) years had already elapsed since the dispossession of the respondents' property, does not hold water. As the registered owners, respondents' right to evict any person illegally occupying their property is imprescriptible. In the case of Labrador v. Perlas,[24] the Court held that: x x x As a registered owner, petitioner has a right to eject any person illegally occupying his property. This right is imprescriptible and can never be barred by laches. In Bishop v. Court of Appeals, we held, thus:
	GR No. 165851 2011-02-02	MANUEL CATINDIG v. AURORA IRENE VDA. DE MENESES PERALTA, J.
In addition, as the registered owner, respondent's right to evict any person illegally occupying her property is imprescreptible. In the recent case of Gaudencio Labrador, represented by Lulu Labrador Uson, as Attorney-in-Fact v. Sps. Ildefonso Perlas and Pacencia Perlas and Sps. Rogelio Pobre and Melinda Fogata Pobre,[17] the Court held that: As a registered owner, petitioner has a right to eject any person illegally occupying his property. This right is imprescriptible and can never be barred by laches. In Bishop v. Court of Appeals, we held, thus:
	GR No. 152423 2010-12-15	SPS. MARCOS R. ESMAQUEL AND VICTORIA SORDEVILLA v. MARIA COPRADA PERALTA, J.
Moreover, as the registered owners, petitioners' right to eject any person illegally occupying their property is not barred by laches. In Gaudencio Labrador, represented by Lulu Labrador Uson, as Attorney-in-Fact v. Spouses Ildefonso Perlas and Pacencia Perlas and Spouse Rogelio Pobre and Melinda Fogata Pobre,[20] the Court held that: x x x As a registered owner, petitioner has a right to eject any person illegally occupying his property. This right is imprescriptible and can never be barred by laches. In Bishop v. Court of Appeals, we held, thus: