This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-02-07 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| Absent any clear showing that petitioner had a hand in the alleged intent to alter the evaluation results of the bidding, the presumption of regularity in the performance of duty should apply. Mere surmises and conjectures, absent any proof whatsoever, will not tilt the balance against this presumption.[32] | |||||
|
2011-10-19 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| From the foregoing, it is imperative that every public official or government employee must make and submit a complete disclosure of his assets, liabilities and net worth in order to suppress any questionable accumulation of wealth.[5] This serves as the basis of the government and the people in monitoring the income and lifestyle of public officials and employees in compliance with the constitutional policy to eradicate corruption, to promote transparency in government, and to ensure that all government employees and officials lead just and modest lives,[6] with the end in view of curtailing and minimizing the opportunities for official corruption and maintaining a standard of honesty in the public service.[7] | |||||