This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-07-01 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Hence, generally, mere presence at the scene of the crime does not in itself amount to conspiracy.[106] Exceptionally, under R.A. No. 8049, the participation of the offenders in the criminal conspiracy can be proven by the prima facie evidence due to their presence during the hazing, unless they prevented the commission of the acts therein. | |||||
|
2012-02-22 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| A dying declaration, although generally inadmissible as evidence due to its hearsay character, may nonetheless be admitted when the following requisites concur, namely: (a) that the declaration must concern the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death; (b) that at the time the declaration is made, the declarant is under a consciousness of an impending death; (c) that the declarant is competent as a witness; and (d) that the declaration is offered in a criminal case for homicide, murder, or parricide, in which the declarant is a victim.[19] | |||||