This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2014-01-20 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| The overriding consideration when extrinsic fraud is alleged is that the fraudulent scheme of the prevailing litigant prevented the petitioner from having his day in court.[35] Nonetheless, extrinsic fraud shall not be a valid ground if it was availed of, or could have been availed of, in a motion for new trial or petition for relief.[36] | |||||