Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 164195 2011-04-05	APO FRUITS CORPORATION v. LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES BRION, J.
This argument completely overlooks the definition of just compensation already established in jurisprudence. Apart from the requirement that compensation for expropriated land must be fair and reasonable, compensation, to be "just," must also be made without delay.[6] In simpler terms, for the government's payment to be considered just compensation, the landowner must receive it in full without delay.
	GR No. 164195 2010-10-12	APO FRUITS CORPORATION v. LAND BANK OF PHILIPPINES BRION, J.
Apart from the requirement that compensation for expropriated land must be fair and reasonable, compensation, to be "just," must also be made without delay.[12] Without prompt payment, compensation cannot be considered "just" if the property is immediately taken as the property owner suffers the immediate deprivation of both his land and its fruits or income.