This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2012-09-12 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| The petitioners seek reconsideration of the Court's denial of their appeal on the ground that the CA, in fact, committed reversible error in: (1) failing to declare that Canoy is not personally liable in the present case; (2) disregarding the rule laid down in Talam v. National Labor Relations Commission[12] on the proper appreciation of quitclaims; and (3) disregarding prevailing jurisprudence which places on the respondents the burden of proving that their commissions were earned through actual market transactions attributable to them. | |||||