Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 174471 2016-01-12	PEOPLE v. JERRY PEPINO Y RUERAS BRION, J.
Jurisprudence holds that the natural reaction of victims of criminal violence is to strive to see the appearance of their assailants and observe the manner the crime was committed. As the Court held in People v. Esoy:[38]
	GR No. 178062 2010-09-08	PEOPLE v. ABDUL AMINOLA Y OMAR VELASCO JR., J.
By reason of the robbery or on the occasion thereof, homicide is committed.[19]
	GR No. 184603 2010-08-02	PEOPLE v. ROMEO LABAGALA Y ABIGONIA PEREZ, J.
As for damages, in the absence of any aggravating circumstances, and as found by the Court of Appeals, the heirs of the victim are entitled to a civil indemnity of P50,000.00, without need of proof other than that death which occurred as a result of the crime. They are also entitled to moral damages in the sum of P50,000.00.[35] Temperate damages, as likewise determined by the Court of Appeals in the amount of P25,000.00 is also granted.