You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

ROMANITA CONCHA v. PAULINO RUBIO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 163598
2015-08-12
AGRARIAN REFORM BENEFICIARIES ASSOCIATION v. FIL-ESTATE INC.
JARDELEZA, J.
Moreover, the DARAB overstepped its jurisdictional boundaries when it declared petitioners as qualified beneficiaries under CARP. In Lercana v. Jalandoni,[50] we ruled that the identification and selection of CARP beneficiaries are matters involving strictly the administrative implementation of the CARP, a matter exclusively cognizable by the Secretary of the Department of Agrarian Reform, and beyond the jurisdiction of the DARAB.[51]